Kajian Revitalisasi Kawasan Pematang Kota Pematangsiantar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kawasan Pematang merupakan salah satu kawasan kuno di Pematangsiantar yang memiliki karakter khas secara historis sebagai ibu kota tradisional Kerajaan Siantar. Karena kurangnya perhatian dalam melakukan penanganan konservasi terhadap Kawasan Pematang semakin mengakibatkan kemunduran vitalitas kawasan tersebut. Kawasan Pematang yang semakin terliha kumuh dimana bangunan - bangunan bersejarah yang tidak terpelihara dan pembangunan rumah masyarakat yang tidak terkendali dan tidak tertata dengan baik. Mengingat besarnya biaya yang diperlukan untuk melakukan Revitalisasi suatu kawasan maka perlu dilakukan suatu kajian apakah kawasan tersebut potensial untuk di revitalisasi. Revitalisasi Kawasan Pematang dapat dilakuakn dengan berpedoman kepada Permen PU No.18 tahun 2007 tentang Pedoman Revitalisasi Kawasan dimana terdapat petunjuk teknis kriteria penilaian lokasi studi apakah potensial untuk di revitalisasi dan tahapan - tahapan Revitalisasi Kawasan yang akan dilaksanakan
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.045 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".