Pengaruh Pemberdayaan Pedagang Kaki Lima Dan Kinerja Perusahaan Daerah Terhadap Pengembangan Pasar Agribisnis Di Pasar Horas Kota Pematangsiantar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRAK Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis Pengaruh Pemberdayaan Pedagang Kaki Lima dan Kinerja Perusahaan Daerah terhadap Pengembangan Pasar Agribisnis di Pasar Horas Kota Pematangsiantar. Populasi penelitian ini adalah masyarakat yang berada di Kota Pematangsiantar. Dengan jumlah penduduk 11.507 jiwa. Dengan mengggunakan rumus penarikan sampel, maka sampel penelitian sebesar 100 orang. Penelitian ini menggunakan regresi ganda, pengolahan data menggunakan SPSS. Dari hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa hasil koefisen determinasi pemberdayaan pedagang kaki lima sebesar 0,556 atau 55,6 hasil koefisen determinasi kinerja perusahaan daerah sebesar 0,595 atau 59,5. Hasil koefisen determinasi Pemberdayaan Pedagang Kaki Lima dan Kinerja Perusahaan Daerah terhadap Pengembangan pasar agribisnis sebesar 0,641 atau 64,1 %. Sedangkan sisa 35,9%, yang tidak masuk kedalam penelitian ini. Jadi dapat disimpulkan bahwa Pemberdayaan Pedagang Kaki Lima dan Kinerja Perusahaan Daerah mempunyai pengaruh terhadap pengembangan pasar agribisnis di Pasar Horas Kota Pematangsiantar. Penelitian ini memberikan sumbangan pemikiran dan saran kepada Perusahaan Daerah Pasar Horas Jaya dalam mengembangkan pasar agribisnis di Pasar Horas Kota Pematangsiantar
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".