MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402292907 · doi:10.1139/cjb-2024-0061

Changes in anatomical structure and cell wall composition during male inflorescence development of <i>Castanea mollissima</i>

2024· article· en· W4402292907 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qingjiyan Wang, Jin Li, Tian Li, Qing Zhang, Qingqin Cao, Yu Xing, Ling Qin, Kefeng Fang

Bibliographic record

VenueBotany · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Reproductive Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsInflorescenceBiologyBotanyCell wallComposition (language)Plant development

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Chinese chestnut ( Castanea mollissima Blume) is a dioecious plant in which the number of male inflorescences far exceeds that of female inflorescences. Therefore, it is of interest to study the differentiation of male flowers in C. mollissima. In this study, the male inflorescences of “Yanshanhongli” C. mollissima were observed. Then, the main components of the cell wall were stained by fluorescence and immunofluorescence labeling techniques to examine the changes in cell wall components. The results showed that the development of the male inflorescence of C. mollissima had different transverse elongation and longitudinal elongation. In addition, the development of male inflorescences and anthers were divided into five and four major stages, respectively, according to the microstructural changes. Immunostaining indicated that the fluorescence intensity of cellulose increased with the development of male inflorescences of C. mollissima. The fluorescence intensity of low-esterified homogalacturonan (HG) was stronger in the early stage, while the fluorescence intensity of high-esterified HG was stronger thereafter. This research provides new insights into the changes in cell wall components during the growth and development of male inflorescences of C. mollissima and important clues for exploring the growth and development mechanism of male inflorescences of C. mollissima.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBotanySame topicPlant Reproductive BiologyFrench-language works237,207