MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402293731 · doi:10.1002/9781119912965.ch8

Streaming Data and Complex Event Processing

2024· other· en· W4402293731 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Database Systems and Queries
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEvent (particle physics)Computer scienceEvent dataComplex event processingData scienceProgramming languageProcess (computing)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chapter 8 concerns streaming data that is characterized by a continuous stream of data tuples, which are often referred to as messages. Platforms for analyzing streaming data, such as Storm, Spark, and Siddhi, are described. The first part of the chapter discusses dynamic priority scheduling that can support dynamic priority changes for applications based on data contents. The second part of the chapter describes systems used for the processing of complex events (CEs). Complex event processing (CEP) is used to handle real-time issues in the context of big data analytics. It facilitates the analysis of multiple streams of data in real time to generate alerts or indicate possible opportunities to be exploited on the system. The CEP concept is explained first and is followed by the description of a mobile smartphone-based CEP system for analyzing the data collected by sensors attached to the body of a patient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Database Systems and QueriesFrench-language works237,207