MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402299066 · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37507

Association of hemoglobin with plasma neurofilament light and white matter hyperintensities in Alzheimer's disease continuum

2024· article· en· W4402299066 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Qin Li, Jiehong Zhan, Zixuan Liao, Jiayu Li, Xiaofeng Li

Bibliographic record

VenueHeliyon · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthGenentechIXICOH. Lundbeck A/SServierChongqing Medical UniversityEisaiNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationPfizerNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationUniversity of Southern CaliforniaBiogenEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers SquibbU.S. Department of DefenseAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeMeso Scale DiagnosticsNational Institute on AgingAlzheimer's Association
KeywordsHyperintensityWhite matterAssociation (psychology)Alzheimer's diseaseMedicineDiseaseNeurosciencePsychologyPathologyMagnetic resonance imagingPsychotherapistRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the association of hemoglobin (Hb) with axonal injury marker plasma neurofilament light (PNFL) and brain structure measurements in the Alzheimer's disease (AD) continuum. Methods: The data used in this study were collected from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database. Participants with cognitively normal, mild cognitive impairment, and mild dementia were included in the data analyses. All participants had available data on blood tests, PNFL levels, neuropsychological assessments, brain structure measurements (including volumes of white matter hyperintensities [WMH], hippocampus, gray matter, and total brain), and Aβ positron emission tomography standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) at baseline. Aβ-positive was defined as SUVR threshold value > 1.11. Linear regression, restricted cubic spline, and causal mediation analyses were conducted to investigate the association of Hb concentration with PNFL levels and brain structure measurements. Stratified analyses were also employed to evaluate the association between Hb concentration and PNFL levels across different APOE genotypes and sex. Results: In the Aβ-positive group, Hb concentration was associated with PNFL levels (β = -0.022, p = 0.002). Stratified analyses suggested an association between Hb concentration and PNFL in APOE ɛ4 carriers (β = -0.031, p < 0.001) and males (β = -0.030, p < 0.001) but not in non-carriers and females (p > 0.05). Hb concentration was also associated with WMH volume (β = -0.04, p = 0.028), especially in APOE ɛ4 carriers, with mediation analysis revealing that PNFL mediated the association between Hb concentration and WMH volume. The association of Hb concentration with other brain structure measurements was minimal. Conclusion: In the AD continuum, Hb was associated with axonal injury marker PNFL and WMH volume, particularly in APOE ɛ4 carriers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeliyonSame topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207