Inexact Quantum Square Root Circuit for NISQ Devices
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) computers face significant reliability challenges because they are vulnerable to quantum noise, which severely limits their fidelity in quantum applications. In particular, deep circuits with a large number of quantum gates are susceptible to errors as they are more likely to lose their states in a deep circuit. In this paper, we propose a quantum circuit for square root operation that generates correct results on NISQ devices. The square root operation is used in many applications such as complex number computations, computer graphics, etc. While there have been limited studies on quantum square root circuits, none of them can be implemented on NISQ devices. In this work, we simplify the structure of an exact quantum square root circuit and reduce the number of quantum gates. The proposed design reduces the complexity of the square root circuit while maintaining the same level of precision in outputs. In addition, we exploit approximate computing to simplify the circuit further and run it on a real quantum computer. Approximate computing is used in classical computers to enhance the power and/or performance in exchange for accuracy. We exploit approximate computing for a different purpose, which is reducing the depth as well as the number of quantum gates in the square root circuit. To validate the effectiveness of our approach, we conduct experiments on an IBM quantum computer, where our circuit produces meaningful results. Furthermore, we present examples of error-resilient applications to demonstrate the validity of our approximate circuit.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".