A Waste Heat Recovery Solution for Container Farms to Enhance Space Heating Potential
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indoor farming in modular container farms has risen in popularity over the last decade due to its ability to grow fresh produce year-round in a controlled environment. Generally, these farms require a significant amount of energy to create an ideal growing environment for plants. Heat is often generated as a byproduct of this energy conversion process and is usually rejected to the environment. To address this issue, waste heat recovery technology can be used to capture and repurpose this excess heat for other applications, such as space heating for a greenhouse. This research investigates the potential of storing low-grade waste heat in a diurnal rock bed thermal storage and utilizing it to enhance the performance of an air-source heat pump. A comprehensive energy model was developed to analyze the complex energy transfer between the various systems. To refine the energy model, a prototype of the coupled system was designed, built, and tested in Ottawa, Canada. Experimental results showed that there were improvements in the performance of the air-source heat pump when using the heat from a rock bed. However, a continuous supply of waste heat is required to maintain a consistent level of heightened efficiency. From the simulation, it was found that the implementation of the proposed waste heat recovery solution has the potential to yield the most significant benefits and cost savings in cold climate communities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".