MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A weighted integrated forecasting approach based on VMD decomposition reconstruction for high energy-consuming loads

2024· article· en· W4402303170 on OpenAlexaff
Junxiong Gel, Chuang Liu, Fusheng Yuan, Tianshuo Zhao, Fanbo Meng, Yujia Li

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecompositionComputer scienceEnergy (signal processing)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsStatisticsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

At present, high energy-consuming industrial loads such as fused magnesium, industrial manufacturing, and high-tech development have the characteristics of large energy consumption and peak control in the power conversion process. Accurate load forecasting is needed to carry out reasonable production scheduling. In the process of electro motor magnesium smelting, the power load usually has the characteristics of non-stationary, non-periodic, high fluctuation, etc. It makes power load forecasting and scheduling extremely difficult. Therefore, a weighted integrated forecasting method is proposed in this paper for high energy-consuming loads based on variational mode decomposition (VMD) and reconstruction. Firstly, an integrated forecasting model based on a decomposition strategy is established. The original sequence of high energy-consuming loads is decomposed by the VMD method. The multiple models are used to predict and reconstruct the sub-sequences, which improved the forecasting accuracy of the load sequence of fused magnesium by the traditional single model. Secondly, the multi-objective parameter optimization method of the weighted integrated forecasting model is proposed to learn multi-angle sequence implicit information and avoid the influence of the hybridization of the decomposed sequence information. The weight combination is optimized by a multi-objective optimization algorithm, and the accuracy and robustness of the model are optimized simultaneously with MAE and EVS as the optimization objectives. Finally, through the Pareto optimal solution method of adaptive variance risk threshold, the robustness of the model is taken as the constraint condition. The results show that the weighted combination model shows excellent forecasting performance on subsequences with different frequency characteristics. At the same time, the proposed weighted integrated forecasting method scientifically adjusts the combined weights of each model based on multi-objective parameter evolution optimization. It improves the forecasting accuracy and ensures the robustness of the model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.953

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207