MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402305967 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.08.354

Model Predictive Control for Renal Anemia Treatment through Physics-informed Neural Network

2024· article· en· W4402305967 on OpenAlex
Zhongyu Zhang, Zukui Li

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsArtificial neural networkAnemiaControl (management)MedicineIntensive care medicineComputer scienceInternal medicineArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients with chronic kidney disease suffer from renal anemia due to inadequate erythropoietin (EPO) secretion. Determining the optimal EPO dosage and frequency is complex and requires decision-support technologies. Model predictive control (MPC) is an effective decision-making technique that requires a prediction model of the controlled process. In this work, it was discovered that Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Control (PINNC), which integrates physiological model with data-driven methodology, were capable of predicting the patient hemoglobin level with good accuracy and computational efficiency. Based on this prediction model, we developed a zone MPC framework to optimize the dosing strategy. Simulation results show that the proposed control method can serve as an effective tool for determining the optimal EPO dosages for renal anemia patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.888
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it