MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402306868 · doi:10.18280/ts.410405

Skin-NeT: Skin Cancer Diagnosis Using VGG and ResNet-Based Ensemble Learning Approaches

2024· article· en· W4402306868 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdullah Alshehri

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnsemble learningNet (polyhedron)Artificial intelligenceSkin cancerResidual neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceCancerDermatologyDeep learningMedicineMathematicsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To address the critical issue of late skin cancer diagnosis and its severe implications, this study leverages the latest in Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) and machine learning technologies.Despite the alignment of these technologies with professional medical diagnostics, challenges such as data imbalance, management of extensive datasets, and the need for high-quality images for superior feature extraction continue to pose significant hurdles.To overcome these challenges, this work introduced a novel approach utilizing ensemble learning, which significantly enhances the accuracy of early skin cancer detection.This research elaborates on the creation of two distinct ensemble models: one that combines the capabilities of VGG-16 and ResNet-50, and another that utilizes VGG-19 and Xception.These combinations were specifically chosen for their complementary strengths in deep learning and feature extraction, which are crucial for improving diagnostic accuracy.The models were trained on a comprehensive dataset of over 3000 skin images, achieving a groundbreaking training accuracy of 100% and a testing accuracy that reaches up to 85%.The rationale behind selecting these models for ensemble approach is their proven effectiveness in deep learning tasks.VGG models are renowned for their deep convolutional networks that excel in capturing intricate details, while ResNet models effectively address the vanishing gradient problem, enabling deeper network training without compromising performance.This strategic amalgamation enhances the ability to tackle the complexities of skin cancer detection.In comparative analysis, I eschew specific study references for a broader perspective on performance enhancement.The accuracy of these proposed models shows a substantial increase over existing methods, with testing accuracies advancing from the typical range of 75% to 84% observed in prior works, to as high as 85% in my models.This improvement not only demonstrates the superiority of ensemble learning approach over single-model methods but also establishes a new benchmark in the accuracy and reliability of skin cancer diagnostic tools.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementFrench-language works237,207