MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402306996 · doi:10.18280/ts.410409

Efficient Transfer Learning Approach for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Diagnosis: Classification of Lymphocytes and Lymphoblastic Cells

2024· article· en· W4402306996 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sanjay Kumar Singh, Mamoon Rashid, Sultan S. Alshamrani, Mrim M. Alnfiai, Pranshu Saxena, Aditya Khamparia

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTaif University
KeywordsLymphoblastic LeukemiaMedicineTransfer of learningComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceLeukemiaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a severe illness that affects children and adults, and it can be fatal when left untreated.This leukemia strikes children and adolescents suddenly, often claiming their lives within just a few weeks after diagnosis.To diagnose ALL, hematologists investigate blood slides and bone marrow samples.Manual blood testing methods, which have been around for a long time, are typically laborious and may result in lower-quality diagnoses.ALL is essentially the unchecked growth of immature cells found in the bone marrow, often referred to as lymphoblasts.Methods: This research focuses on the classification of lymphoblast and lymphocyte cells using a computer-assisted method that employs deep learning and image processing techniques.This classification involves several steps.Prior to feature extraction, preprocessing and data augmentation are performed on the ALL-IBD dataset.Features are extracted from this augmented database using transfer learning with pre-trained networks (DenseNet121, ResNet50, InceptionV3, Xception).The selected and transformed features, obtained through principal component analysis (PCA), are then subjected to 5-fold cross-validation for hyper-tuning and training of individual machine learning models (LR, SVM, DT, RF).Finally, a soft voting classification model is proposed to predict lymphocytes and lymphoblasts.Results: The suggested ensemble method achieved 98.23% accuracy.SVM and the ensemble model with DenseNet121 and all feature sets reached an AUC of 1.00.LR achieved an AUC of 1.0 with all features and 0.99 with DenseNet121 features.The minimum AUC for DT was 0.64 and for RF was 0.86.AUC with all features was 0.80 for DT and 0.91 for RF.Conclusion: The suggested method uses image processing and deep learning to analyze blood cells automatically, avoiding the many limitations of manual analysis.The acquired results demonstrate that the presented approach may be employed as a diagnostic tool for ALL, which is undoubtedly helpful to pathologists.Observation: This procedure can also be employed for enumeration, as it offers exceptional efficiency and enables prompt suspicion of a diagnosis, which can subsequently be validated by a hematologist using specialized techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicDigital Imaging for Blood DiseasesFrench-language works237,207