MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402307114 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.08.367

Systematic Selection of Constraints for a Novel Dynamic Flux Balance Model of Mammalian Cell Cultures

2024· article· en· W4402307114 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Ghodba, Anne Richelle, Piyush Agarwal, Connaire McCready, Luis Ricardez‐Sandoval, Hector Budman

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSelection (genetic algorithm)Flux (metallurgy)Flux balance analysisBalance (ability)Model selectionBiologyComputational biologyComputer scienceCell biologyBiological systemChemistryArtificial intelligenceNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dynamic flux balance model (DFBA) is a constrained-based optimization modeling approach that has gained popularity for describing microbial cultures but has not been thoroughly investigated for mammalian cell cultures due to their relative complexity. This research aims to identify a DFBA model with minimal constraints and associated parameters to predict data for the fed-batch operation of a mammalian CHO cell culture. The Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) is used to find a minimal set of kinetic constraints. The resulting DFBA model is used to predict 24 metabolites, biomass, and titer with 85 parameters that has a lower BIC and higher R 2 as compared to previously reported kinetic models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in InsectsFrench-language works237,207