MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402307807 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2024.08.407

Fault Detection via Autoencoder Latent Space Differences Between Reference Model and the Plant Operation

2024· article· en· W4402307807 on OpenAlexaff
Enrique Luna Villagómez, Hamidreza Mahyar, Vladimir Mahalec

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoencoderFault (geology)Fault detection and isolationArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceSpace (punctuation)Pattern recognition (psychology)BiologyArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abnormal plant operations are caused by disturbances, process measurement faults, or malfunctioning equipment. Steady-state or dynamic models of the process units are widely available. Since continuous process plants operate under closed-loop control and available plant data often covers a narrow operating window, the process model can generate normal operating data over a wider window to train an autoencoder to represent that data. For deployment in real-time, the plant model accepts process inputs from the plant and calculates outputs; one instance of the autoencoder accepts data from the plant, and the other accepts data from the model. The occurrence of a process fault leads to Differences in the latent space variables of the two instances of the autoencoder, which enables fault detection. Compared to a traditional PCA-based fault detection framework, an autoencoder-based framework can model nonlinear processes, which is not possible by using PCA or dynamic PCA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score0.479

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207