MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402308777 · doi:10.18280/ts.410436

An Improved Deep Network Model to Isolate Lung Nodules from Histopathological Images Using an Orchestrated and Shifted Window Vision Transformer

2024· article· en· W4402308777 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Poluru Sabitha, R. Aroul Canessane, M. S. Minu, Vinayagamoorthy Gowri, Maria Soosai Antony Vigil

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI in cancer detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformerWindow (computing)Artificial intelligenceLungComputer scienceComputer visionMedicineEngineeringElectrical engineeringInternal medicineVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cancer is a major health issue worldwide.Classification of pulmonary (lung) nodules into benign and malicious is one of the stimulating exploration domain as it is the second most serious malignancy and the crucial source of universal deaths.Accurate identification of lung cancer from Computed Tomography (CT) scans achieves an important role in cancer diagnostics system.Besides, the accuracy of the manual isolation framework for lung cancer is dependent on the severity of the malignancy and the efficiency of the radiologist, which frequently cause inappropriate decisions.Thus, the segmentation of the affected area from the CT images is a very challenging task since the morphological features of pulmonary nodules are very complex.Recently, Machine Learning (ML) approaches, particularly Deep Learning (DL) methods enable medical industry to analyse huge data at remarkable speeds without debasing the accuracy of tumour segmentation algorithms.However, due to minute inter-class variances between the affected area and its adjacent tissues and the huge diversity of isolation targets, the deep models often fail to segment lung nodules accurately.To solve these issues, we develop an Orchestrated and Shifted Window Transformer (OSWT) with Multi-head self-attention (MSA) units to isolate the abnormal (diseased) area from pulmonary CT images precisely.We assess OSWT on a CT lung image dataset, called The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA or Atlas), and relate the performance of the proposed OSWT against 7 innovative classification models in terms of performance measures.The segment or using an OSWT delivers 98.4% dice similarity index (DSI), 96.5% of Jaccard similarity measure (JSM), 0.73% of volume error (VE), and 0.99s average computational cost.The extensive experimental results demonstrate that the OSWT model realizes improved performance and is more suitable for isolating abnormal cancer area from CT scans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicAI in cancer detectionFrench-language works237,207