MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402309933 · doi:10.47854/q3ez4s16

Sacrifice

2024· article· fr· W4402309933 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anne‐Marie Brisebarre

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropen · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Theory and Influence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSacrificePhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dès ses débuts, l’anthropologie s’est intéressée aux sacrifices dans les sociétés anciennes (Grèce, Inde, Rome, Moyen-Orient), ainsi que dans des sociétés à tradition orale, en particulier africaines, à partir des textes fondateurs des religions antiques ou les récits des voyageurs découvrant les pratiques des « indigènes ». Si des sacrifices étaient autrefois pratiqués par les trois religions monothéistes, seule la religion musulmane a conservé divers rites sacrificiels, individuels ou collectifs. Le plus emblématique, l’ayd al-kabîr (Grande fête) ou ayd al-adha (Fête du sacrifice), renouvellement du sacrifice ibrahîmien et de celui du Prophète fondateur de l’islam, inclus dans le pèlerinage à la Mecque, est effectué par l’ensemble des familles musulmanes, rurales et urbaines, y compris de façon nouvelle (par procuration ou délégation) par celles immigrées dans les pays occidentaux.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropenSame topicPolitical Theory and InfluenceFrench-language works237,207