MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402312002 · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.09.001

Association between asymptomatic bacteriuria in pregnancy and adverse pregnancy- and births outcomes. A systematic review

2024· review· en· W4402312002 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mirna Abde, Nina Weis, Anette Kjærbye‐Thygesen, Ellen Moseholm

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Tract Infections Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAsymptomatic bacteriuriaObstetricsPregnancyAsymptomaticGynecologyBacteriuriaAdverse effectUrineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Existing guidelines for screening and treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) in pregnancy are based on studies completed more than 30 years ago. This evidence is characterized by a lack of consensus on the association between ASB and adverse pregnancy- and birth outcomes. AIM: colony-forming units (cfu) of the same bacteria per ml urine in two consecutive voided cultures without any symptoms) and pregnancy outcomes (pyelonephritis, chorioamnionitis, prelabour rupture of membranes (PROM)), and birth outcomes (preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW) and small for gestational age (SGA)). The impact of the most serious pathogens E. coli and Group B streptococci (GBS) on these outcomes was also examined. METHODS: A systematic literature search was prepared according to the guideline Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). The search was conducted in the databases Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library, with a systematic strategy based on the PICO acronym (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome). Covidence was used as a screening- and data extraction tool. Randomized trials and observational studies published between, January 01, 2005-February 10, 2023, were identified. The Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool 2 and the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale were applied to assess the quality of the included studies. A protocol was published prior to this review, at the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO). RESULTS: The database search yielded 3029 records. Fourteen studies were included. Untreated pregnant women with ASB had significantly increased odds of pyelonephritis. Most of the studies showed no significant association between treated ASB and pyelonephritis. In treated ASB, an increased risk of both chorioamnionitis and PROM was found. Divergent results were found in the association between ASB and PTB, as well as in the association between untreated ASB and LBW. Most of the studies showed no significant association between treated ASB and LBW. One study found no significant association between untreated/treated ASB and SGA. No studies were identified that addressed the association between ASB with E. coli/GBS and the outcomes examined. CONCLUSION: There is a need for more recent high-quality studies to investigate the association between untreated/treated ASB and pregnancy- and birth outcomes, and to assess the impact of E. coli/GBS on these outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.011
Bibliometrics0.0120.012
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive BiologySame topicUrinary Tract Infections ManagementFrench-language works237,207