NIRSTORM: a Brainstorm extension dedicated to functional Near Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) data analysis, advanced 3D reconstructions, and optimal probe design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Significance We propose NIRSTORM, a software package built within Brainstorm environment, enabling full data analysis of functional Near InfraRed Spectroscopy (fNIRS) data from experiment planning to 3D reconstruction of hemodynamic fluctuations on the cortical surface using optical tomographic approaches. NIRSTORM enables the integration of fNIRS analysis within a multimodal setup making it easy to study fNIRS in combination with other multimodal data such as electroencephalography (EEG) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Aim NIRSTORM aims to provide an easy-to-use and fully modular toolbox for fNIRS analysis from experimental planning to optical tomography 3D reconstruction extending Brainstorm capacity for multimodal analysis. Approach NIRSTORM was developed in MATLAB® and integrated as a plugin of the software Brainstorm. Brainstorm is a GUI-oriented, widely used software originally dedicated to statistical analysis and source imaging of EEG and magnetoencephalography (MEG) data. Results In addition to conventional fNIRS preprocessing steps, including standard channel space and statistical analyses, NIRSTORM provides advanced methods dedicated to optimal probe placement, allowing personalized fNIRS study designs and accurate near-infrared optical tomography within the Maximum Entropy on the Mean (MEM) framework. Conclusion NIRSTORM is an open-access, user-friendly plugin extending the capacity of Brainstorm, for fNIRS analysis, therefore narrowing the gap between EEG/MEG and hemodynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.046 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".