An Ensemble Deep Neural Network-Based Method for Person Identification Using Electrocardiogram Signals Acquired on Different Days
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Electrocardiogram (ECG) signals are a measure minute electrical signals generated during the cardiac cycle, a biometric signal that occurs during vital human activity. ECG signals are susceptible to various types of noise depending on the data acquisition conditions, with factors such as sensor placement and the physiological and mental states of the subject contributing to the diverse shapes of these signals. When the data are acquired in a single session, the environmental variables are relatively similar, resulting in similar ECG signals; however, in subsequent sessions, even for the same person, changes in the environmental variables can alter the signal shape. This phenomenon poses challenges for person identification using ECG signals acquired on different days. To improve the performance of individual identification, even when ECG data is acquired on different days, this paper proposes an ensemble deep neural network for person identification by comparing and analyzing the ECG recognition performance under various conditions. The proposed ensemble deep neural network comprises three streams that incorporate two well-known pretrained models. Each network receives the time-frequency representation of ECG signals as input, and a stream reuses the same network structure under different learning conditions with or without data augmentation. The proposed ensemble deep neural network was validated on the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt dataset, and the results confirmed a 3.39% improvement in accuracy compared to existing methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".