MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402321265 · doi:10.5376/mgg.2024.15.0008

Genetic Structure and Diversity in <i>Zea</i> Genus: Implications for Conservation and Breeding

2024· article· en· W4402321265 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yunfei Cai, Bin Chen, Junfeng Hou, Fucheng Zhao, Guiyue Wang, Renxiang Cai

Bibliographic record

VenueMaize Genomics and Genetics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Reproductive Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenusGenetic diversityBiologyZoologyEvolutionary biologyConservation geneticsGeographyEcologyGeneticsMicrosatelliteDemographyAlleleSociologyPopulationGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Zea genus , encompassing vital crop species like maize, holds significant genetic diversity essential for agricultural sustainability and food security. This study aims to elucidate the genetic structure and diversity within Zea species, underscore the importance of conserving these genetic resources, and highlight their implications for breeding programs. The phylogenetic relationships within Zea , genetic variation, and methods for assessing genetic structure are explored to provide a comprehensive understanding of the genus's genetic framework. The study also examines molecular markers, geographic distribution, and factors influencing genetic diversity, emphasizing the need for robust conservation strategies. Threats to genetic diversity are identified, alongside conservation efforts including the role of gene banks, ex situ, and in situ conservation. The utilization of genetic diversity in breeding programs is discussed, focusing on stress resistance, adaptability, yield enhancement, and modern breeding techniques such as genomic selection. Case studies of successful breeding programs and conservation projects illustrate practical applications and challenges. Future directions highlight advances in genomic tools, integrating conservation with breeding efforts, and policy considerations. This study underscores the critical need for continued research and strategic conservation to harness the full potential of Zea genetic resources for future agricultural innovation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaize Genomics and GeneticsSame topicPlant Reproductive BiologyFrench-language works237,207