MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402321335 · doi:10.5376/mgg.2024.15.0013

Transposable Elements in Zea: Their Role in Genetic Diversity and Evolution

2024· article· en· W4402321335 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shaomin Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueMaize Genomics and Genetics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransposable elementDiversity (politics)Evolutionary biologyGenetic diversityZea maysBiologyDNA Transposable ElementsGeneticsGenomeSociologyAgronomyGeneDemographyPopulationAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transposable elements (TEs) are significant contributors to genetic diversity and evolutionary processes in Zea mays (maize). These mobile genetic elements can move within the genome, inducing mutations, structural variations, and changes in gene expression, which collectively enhance genetic variability and adaptability. TEs are maintained in a delicate balance within the genome, as they can be both deleterious and beneficial. In maize, TEs have been shown to play crucial roles in genome evolution, including the generation of allelic diversity and the regulation of gene expression. The maize genome is particularly rich in TEs, with recent advancements in annotation methods revealing a higher abundance and diversity of TEs than previously recognized. Moreover, the interplay between TEs and epigenetic mechanisms, such as RNA N6-methyladenosine modification, further underscores their role in the adaptive evolution of maize. This study synthesizes current knowledge on the impact of TEs on the genetic diversity and evolutionary dynamics of maize, highlighting their dual role as both genomic parasites and symbionts. The findings underscore the importance of TEs in shaping the maize genome and their potential in driving adaptive responses to environmental challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMaize Genomics and GeneticsSame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207