MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402322000 · doi:10.56827/jrsmms.2024.1102.1

AN OVERVIEW OF RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN FUNCTIONS OF MATRIX ARGUMENT

2022· article· en· W4402322000 on OpenAlexaff
A. M. Mathai

Bibliographic record

VenueJOURNAL OF RAMANUJAN SOCIETY OF MATHEMATICS AND MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArgument (complex analysis)Matrix (chemical analysis)Computer scienceEpistemologyPhilosophyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this article is to introduce the readers, especially the researchers, to some topics connected with functions of matrix argument, scaling models, distributions of products and ratios, Bayesian structures, symmetric products and symmetric ratios of matrices, scalar and matrix-variate fractional integrals, functions of matrix argument through entropy optimization, singular matrix-variate gamma and beta functions etc which are currently active so that interested readers can get into these classes of problems for their current research or teaching. Let X be a p * q,p ≤ q matrix of rank p in the real domain. If the function f(X), associated with X, is a function of XX, where a prime denotes the transpose, then such a function appears in a number of different disciplines. This paper examines the recent developments in such matrix-variate functions when X is in the real or complex domain. Connections to Bayes procedures, quantum physics, scalar and matrix texture models in communication and engineering problems, fractional integrals, distributions of symmetric products and symmetric ratios of matrices, singular matrix-variate gamma and beta functions and other related areas are pointed out. Only an overview of the current research in these topics with some illustrative examples are given in this paper. Since the material is summarized from the author's own works, most of the references are author's own papers, and hence similarity index, similarity with author's own works, may be high. The materials also cover some current results which are being published.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJOURNAL OF RAMANUJAN SOCIETY OF MATHEMATICS AND MATHEMATICAL SCIENCESSame topicComputability, Logic, AI AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207