The ankle–brachial index, gastrocnemius mitochondrial respirometry, and walking performance in people with and without peripheral artery disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Mitochondrial abnormalities exist in lower-extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD), yet the association of the ankle–brachial index (ABI) with mitochondrial respiration in gastrocnemius muscle is unknown. The association of gastrocnemius mitochondrial respiration with 6-minute walk distance in PAD is unknown. This objective of this study was to describe associations of the ABI with mitochondrial respiratory function in gastrocnemius muscle biopsies and associations of gastrocnemius mitochondrial respirometry with 6-minute walk distance in people with and without PAD. Methods: People with (ABI ⩽ 0.90) and without (ABI 1.00–1.40) PAD were enrolled. ABI and 6-minute walk distance were measured. Mitochondrial function of permeabilized myofibers from gastrocnemius biopsies was measured with high-resolution respirometry. Results: A total of 30 people with PAD (71.7 years, mean ABI: 0.64) and 68 without PAD (71.8 years, ABI: 1.17) participated. In non-PAD participants, higher ABI values were associated significantly with better mitochondrial respiration (Pearson correlation for maximal oxidative phosphorylation P CI+II : +0.29, p = 0.016). In PAD, the ABI correlated negatively and not significantly with mitochondrial respiration (Pearson correlation for P CI+II : –0.17, p = 0.38). In people without PAD, better mitochondrial respiration was associated with better 6-minute walk distance (Pearson correlation: +0.51, p < 0.001), but this association was not present in PAD (Pearson correlation: +0.10, p = 0.59). Conclusions: Major differences exist between people with and without PAD in the association of gastrocnemius mitochondrial respiration with ABI and 6-minute walk distance. Among people without PAD, ABI and walking performance were positively associated with mitochondrial respiratory function. These associations were not observed in PAD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".