MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402329561 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

JADES

2024· article· en· W4402329561 on OpenAlexaff
R. Maiolino, Jan Scholtz, Emma Curtis-Lake, Stefano Carniani, William Baker, Anna de Graaff, Sandro Tacchella, Hannah Übler, Francesco D’Eugenio, Joris Witstok, Mirko Curti, Santiago Arribas, Andrew J. Bunker, S. Charlot, Jacopo Chevallard, Daniel J. Eisenstein, Eiichi Egami, Zhiyuan Ji, Gareth C. Jones, Jianwei Lyu, Tim Rawle, Brant Robertson, W. Rujopakarn, Michele Perna, Fengwu Sun, Giacomo Venturi, Christina C. Williams, Chris J. Willott

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsHerzberg Institute of Astrophysics
FundersRoyal SocietyUK Research and Innovation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsPopulationAstronomyDemographySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spectroscopy with the James Webb Space Telescope has opened the possibility of identifying moderate-luminosity active galactic nuclei (AGNs) in the early Universe, at and beyond the epoch of re-ionisation, complementing previous surveys of much more luminous (and much rarer) quasars. We present 12 new AGNs at 4 < z < 7 in the JADES survey (in addition to the previously identified AGN in GN-z11 at z = 10.6) revealed through the detection of a broad-line region (BLR) seen in the Balmer emission lines. The depth of JADES, together with the use of three different spectral resolutions, enables us to probe a lower-mass regime relative to previous studies. In a few cases, we find evidence for two broad components of H α , which suggests that these could be candidate merging black holes (BHs), although a complex BLR geometry cannot be excluded. The inferred BH masses range from 8 × 10 7 M ⊙ down to 4 × 10 5 M ⊙ , interestingly probing the regime expected for direct collapse BHs. The inferred AGN bolometric luminosities (∼10 44 − 10 45 erg/s) imply accretion rates that are < 0.5 times the Eddington rate in most cases. However, small BHs, with M BH ∼ 10 6 M ⊙ , tend to accrete at Eddington or super-Eddington rates. These BHs at z ∼ 4–11 are over-massive relative to their host galaxies’ stellar masses when compared to the local M BH − M star relation, even approaching M BH ∼ M star , as was expected from heavy BH seeds and/or super-Eddington accretion scenarios. However, we find that these early BHs tend to be more consistent with the local relation between M BH and velocity dispersion, as well as between M BH and dynamical mass, suggesting that these are more fundamental and universal relations. On the classical, optical narrow-line excitation-diagnostic diagrams, these AGNs are located in the region that is locally occupied by star-forming galaxies, implying that they would be missed by the standard classification techniques if they did not display broad lines. Their location on the diagram is consistent with what is expected for AGNs hosted in metal-poor galaxies (Z ∼ 0.1 − 0.2 Z ⊙ ). The fraction of broad-line AGNs with L AGN > 10 44 erg/s among galaxies in the redshift range of 4 < z < 6 is about 10%, suggesting that the contribution of AGNs and their hosts to the re-ionisation of the Universe is > 10%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1990.171

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations325
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207