The needs of parents of children with allergic diseases in preschool and school: A focus-group study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the perceived physical and psychological needs of parents of children with allergic diseases and asthma regarding allergy management in preschools and schools. METHODS: We conducted a semi-structured focus group study with parents of children (ages 2-13 years) with different types of allergic diseases with/without asthma living in Stockholm, Sweden. Data were analyzed qualitative with systematic text condensation. RESULTS: Across 4 focus groups, involving 25 parents, four primary themes representing parents' expressed needs related to allergy management in preschools and schools emerged: (i) Well-implemented routines (to create an allergy-safe physical environment where personnel have clear responsibilities and communication); (ii) Allergy competence among personnel (basic and practical knowledge, being able to act in emergency situations); (iii) My child is to be treated equally (with equal conditions and for their child to being included); (iv) To feel trust (parents need to be understood, taken seriously and feel confident in the preschool/school personnel's ability to take care of their child in a secure way). CONCLUSION: This qualitative study shows parents needs regarding general allergy management in preschool/school. These needs emphasized well implemented allergy routines, improved allergy knowledge and competence among personnel, importance of equal conditions for children with allergic disease and establishing a trustful allergy-supportive relationship with both parents and children. IMPLICATIONS IN PRACTICE: The study findings provide crucial insights for school administrators, teachers, and health care professionals on how to improve allergy management in preschools and schools.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".