Multiple perspectives on the emergence of the invasive colonial tunicate Didemnum vexillum Kott, 2002 in the western Bay of Fundy, Atlantic Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The invasive colonial tunicate, Didemnum vexillum Kott, 2022 was initially observed in Atlantic Canada in Nova Scotia in 2013 and has since been expected to spread to the western side of the Canadian Bay of Fundy due to colonies known to be present in nearby Eastport, Maine.Since 2018, we collected water environmental DNA (eDNA) samples at eight sites in the Quoddy Region in the western side of the Canadian Bay of Fundy.In 2021 and 2022 we used diver-based visual surveys and sample collection, as well as a surface-deployed near-seafloor optical imaging system to document the presence and extent of D. vexillum in the Head Harbour/West Isles/Passages Ecologically and Biologically Significant Area (EBSA) within the Quoddy Region.Forty-one dive sites were surveyed via SCUBA, and seven near-seafloor camera transects were conducted at depths deeper than dive limits (~ 30 m), collecting continuous highdefinition video and periodic high-resolution still images.Didemnum vexillum was detected at two sites from eDNA metabarcoding and quantitative PCR in 2018, 2020 and 2021, and observed by divers at 11 sites, two of which exhibited extensive tunicate coverage.Of the 1945 m 2 area surveyed by the near-seafloor drift camera system, D. vexillum occurred at depths to 118 m and across a spatial extent of 858 m 2 , of which 170 m 2 contained numerous tunicate patches and/or a homogenous mat.Didemnum vexillum was observed extensively overgrowing benthic substrates and fauna, possibly threatening the diversity of natural benthic habitats in the EBSA and adjacent areas supporting numerous commercial fisheries.This study is the first to report D. vexillum presence in the Canadian western Bay of Fundy, and the first to observe colonies at depths exceeding previous records of 81 m.We conclude by providing advice on how to improve coastal invasive species surveys from the combination of biodiversity metrics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".