MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402335613 · doi:10.1177/10996362241282863

Numerical study on structured sandwich panels exposed to spherical air explosions

2024· article· en· W4402335613 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Sandwich Structures & Materials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Response to Dynamic Loads
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural engineeringMaterials scienceMechanicsAerospace engineeringEnvironmental scienceEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a need to develop innovative protective shield structures to withstand extreme loads, such as impact and blast loading. Sandwich structures that absorb significant kinetic energy as strain energy through plastic deformation offer superior protection. This study conducts a numerical analysis of structured sandwich protective structures subjected to airblast loads using finite element modeling. First, an experimental result from the literature was used to validate and verify finite element models of an architected sandwich structure modeled in Abaqus/Explicit software. Second, parametric studies were conducted on sandwich structures with additional layers of insert plates and newly proposed core topologies for viable shield protection against airblast loading. The finite element analysis results indicated that, under the same impulsive load, the control sandwich panel exhibited higher kinetic energy, demanding a proportionally larger internal energy. Conversely, sandwich structures with additional inner core insert plates dissipated the imposed kinetic energy more efficiently, due to the inelastic plastic deformation of the proposed core configurations. Moreover, the energy absorption capacity and back sheet displacement time-history were significantly improved by dense-hierarchical inner core configurations. Additionally, the parametric study analysis showed that increasing the number of insert plates and designing the core topology of cellular walls to be redundant, dense-hierarchical, and braced against buckling significantly reduced core collapse mechanisms such as folding, buckling, and crushing. However, despite these benefits, a reversed effect on the areal specific energy absorption index was observed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.198
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it