Leveraging Machine Learning & Mobile Application Technology for Vitiligo Management: A Proof-of-Concept
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Vitiligo, a dermatological condition characterized by depigmented patches on the skin, affects up to 2% of the global population. Its management is complex, often hindered by delayed diagnosis due to limited access to dermatologists and/ digital tools. Recent advancements in machine learning (ML) offer a potential solution by providing digital tools for early detection and management. This proof-of-concept study describes the development of a machine learning pipeline integrated into a mobile application for vitiligo assessment. Using a dataset of 1,309 images, including segmental and generalized vitiligo, the CNN was trained for binary classification with an accuracy of 95%. The model segments depigmented patches and conducts colorimetric analysis for precise evaluation. We compared traditional Wood’s lamp imaging with CNN-generated maps, showing comparable or superior results in detecting faint depigmentation. Developed using Flutter for cross-platform compatibility, the app enables patients to upload images for analysis and track disease progression. A Golang-based backend ensures robust data management, while a PostgreSQL database supports secure storage of patient information. The integration of Azure Active Directory enhances security and user authentication. This approach aims to bridge the gap in dermatological care by providing an accessible, ML-driven solution for vitiligo management. Future iterations will expand the applications’ capability to screen for other depigmentation disorders, incorporate automated scoring systems for more personalized patient management, and communication services.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".