MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Group-random algorithm to generate representative volume element models for composites

2024· article· en· W4402341313 on OpenAlexafffund
Guodong Xu, Yang-peng Zheng, Feng-rui Liu, Xiao-tian Yi, Liying Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Mechanical Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Material Mechanics
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersWestern UniversityShantou University
KeywordsGroup (periodic table)Volume (thermodynamics)AlgorithmElement (criminal law)Finite element methodRepresentative elementary volumeComposite materialMaterials scienceMathematicsStructural engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most commonly used methods for characterizing the mechanical properties of discontinuous fiber reinforced composites (DFRC) is to establish a Representative Volume Element (RVE) model and perform finite element (FE) analysis. However, FE analysis on RVE models established by traditional sampling algorithms is often computationally expensive due to the large size of RVE that is required to be statistically representative of the composite. To address this issue, this paper proposes a new approach for constructing RVE models with more accurate description of fiber orientation, aiming to make the FE modelling more efficient by using an RVE with small size. When establishing RVE models with given target fiber orientation tensor, it is very challenging to accurately capture the orientation of fibers. In order to mitigate the error between the orientation tensor reconstructed by fibers generated in the RVE and the target orientation tensor, a group-random algorithm is proposed in the current work to generate RVE models. Unlike the traditional algorithm, in which fibers are sampled one by one in the RVE, the group-random algorithm samples a group of four fibers at one time in order to eliminate the error of the off-diagonal components of the reconstructed orientation tensor in the principal coordinate system. Then a modification tensor is further introduced to mitigate the error of the diagonal components of the reconstructed orientation tensor. Simulation results show that the orientation tensor error could be significantly reduced by the group-random algorithm even for the RVE with low number of fibers. The merits of the group-random algorithm are also witnessed by the stability and accuracy of predicting the elastic constants of composite materials through RVE modeling. It is thus concluded that the major advantage of this work is to provide an alternatively feasible strategy to substantially improve computational efficiency of RVE modelling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Mechanical SciencesSame topicComposite Material MechanicsFrench-language works237,207