Pengelompokan Data Pendistribusian Listrik Menggunakan Algoritma Mean Shift
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini mengkaji regionalisasi dan klasterisasi data distribusi listrik di Indonesia menggunakan algoritma Mean Shift, dengan tujuan untuk meningkatkan efisiensi distribusi energi di berbagai wilayah geografis yang beragam. Listrik memiliki peran krusial dalam kehidupan modern namun distribusinya masih belum merata, terutama di daerah terpencil dan pedesaan yang terkendala oleh akses dan keterbatasan dana. Sebagai salah satu Bada Usaha Milik Negera (BUMN) utama di sektor ketenagalistrikan, Perusahaan Listrik Negera (PLN) bertanggung jawab dalam menyediakan listrik di seluruh Indonesia, mendukung pertumbuhan ekonomi melalui penyediaan energi untuk sektor industri, pertanian, dan perdagangan. Dengan menggunakan algoritma Mean Shift, penelitian ini mengelompokkan Indonesia menjadi Sumatra, Jawa-Bali, Kalimantan-Sulawesi, dan Papua berdasarkan pola distribusi listrik, dengan menemukan bahwa pengaturan bandwidth optimal 0.5 menghasilkan tiga klaster per wilayah yang mencerminkan infrastruktur serupa, kebutuhan energi, dan sektor ekonomi dominan. Temuan ini menunjukkan fleksibilitas Mean Shift dalam menangani struktur data yang kompleks tanpa jumlah klaster yang telah ditentukan sebelumnya, yang penting untuk perencanaan strategis dalam pengelolaan energi di Indonesia demi mencapai distribusi listrik yang lebih efisien dan berkelanjutan
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".