MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402351208 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3456295

A Novel Hybrid Model for Short-Term Traffic Flow Prediction Based on Spatio-Temporal Deep Learning With Considering Associated Factors Selection

2024· article· en· W4402351208 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yingping Tang, Qiang Shang, Longjiao Yin

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersShandong Provincial Postdoctoral Science FoundationFederation for the Humanities and Social Sciences
KeywordsComputer scienceTerm (time)Selection (genetic algorithm)Artificial intelligenceMachine learningDeep learningTraffic flow (computer networking)Data miningComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effective predicting of traffic flow is the key to fully utilizing the carrying capacity of roads and improving the travel experience. In order to overcome the randomness and volatility of traffic flow, a novel hybrid model for short-term traffic flow prediction based on spatio-temporal deep learning with considering associated factors selection is proposed. In this model, traffic flow with high spatial relevance is identified firstly with the use of the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient (PPMCC), then associated factors affecting traffic flow are screened with the use of Random Forest (RF), finally, the results of the two steps mentioned above and the historical traffic flow data are used as input, and the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Bidirectional Gated Recurrent Unit (BiGRU) are used to perceive the spatiotemporal characteristics of traffic flow and the hidden relationships between various factors and traffic flow to predict traffic flow. To test the performance of the proposed model, seven baseline models proposed in the existing literature are compared on publicly available datasets using four indexes to evaluate the performance of the models. In addition, we conducted an ablation study. The results showed that the proposed model has a 39% decrease in root mean square error and a 37% decrease in mean absolute error compared to the baseline models with the best performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207