MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

SlideMLP: A Pure Multi-layer Perceptrons Method For Medical Image Segmentation

2024· article· en· W4402351617 on OpenAlexaff
Chaoqi Han, Bingcai Chen, Chanjuan Liu, Qian Ning, Victor C. M. Leung, Shouzhen Jiao, Qing Liu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Neural Network Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceImage segmentationPerceptronArtificial intelligenceComputer visionLayer (electronics)SegmentationPattern recognition (psychology)Scale-space segmentationImage (mathematics)Artificial neural networkMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Convolutional Neural Networks and Attention-based Transformer have emerged as the preferred models for medical image processing. Recently, specific network architectures relying solely on multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) have gained popularity and demonstrated excellent results in various computer vision tasks. In particular, CycleMLP has demonstrated good performance in dense prediction tasks owing to its adaptability to image size and linear computational complexity. However, the basic operator of CycleMLP has a fixed sampling location for any feature map and samples very few target organs in medical images characterized by an extreme imbalance between foreground and background. Therefore, effectively extracting the features of target organs becomes challenging. In this paper, we propose a new MLP-like module, SlideMLP, by considering the sparsity of target organs in medical images. This module extracts a set of offsets from the input feature maps and utilizes these offsets to re-select the sampling points. This approach effectively enhances the sampling rate of target organs while retaining the advantages of CycleMLP. Additionally, we constructed a U-shaped network with a pure MLP using this module and assessed its robustness using two datasets with different modalities. Comparative results with state-of-the-art methods demonstrate that the method proposed in this paper can achieve a substantial Dice Similarity Coe cient (DSC) while utilizing fewer parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207