MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Coordinate Attention Based 3D-CNN Using Ghost Multi-Scale for Diagnosing Alzheimer’s Disease

2024· article· en· W4402351993 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Xiaolu Lin, Pinya Lu, Jie Pan, Hongqin Yang, Xuemei Ding

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHORIZON EUROPE HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthGenentechIXICOH. Lundbeck A/SServierEisaiNorthern California Institute for Research and EducationPfizerNovartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationUniversity of Southern CaliforniaBiogenEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers SquibbBioClinicaU.S. Department of DefenseAlzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging InitiativeMeso Scale DiagnosticsAlzheimer's Association
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceScale (ratio)Pattern recognition (psychology)CartographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disease and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is the early stage of AD. Previous studies have predominantly focused on binary classification using 3 dimensional - convolutional neural network (3D-CNN) for AD diagnosis, with limited progress in multi-classification. Moreover, the current 3D-CNNs often adopt a single-scale architecture with massive parameters growth. Additionally, obtaining precise location information of brain imaging data is crucial for improving the classification accuracy with 3D-CNN. Hence, we propose a multi-scale 3D-CNN based on coordinate attention mechanism to marvelously capture and integrate 3D features with fewer parameters, improving the accuracy of AD diagnosis. A total of 447 cognitively normal (CN), 512 MCI, and 358 AD sMRI images from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative datasets are used for multi-class classification task, yielding a classification accuracy of 92.8%. The model merely involves 2.41 M parameters and achieves the best classification results with the least number of parameters when compared to other representative CNN architectures including ResNet 18, ResNet 34, ConvNeXt tiny, and VGG 11. Through the ablation experiment, the addition of attention mechanism and the multi-scale classification enhances the classification performance by 4.5% and 1.5%, respectively. Furthermore, our model outperforms the other six existing studies in terms of accuracy for classifying AD vs. MCI vs. CN. Overall, this study underscores the efficacy of our approach for AD diagnosis, showcasing its utility in diagnosing AD patients and providing novel insights for diagnosing other neurological disorder diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207