Particle‐based MR modeling with diffusion, microstructure, and enzymatic reactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Purpose To develop a novel particle‐based in silico MR model and demonstrate applications of this model to signal mechanisms which are affected by the spatial organization of particles, including metabolic reaction kinetics, microstructural effects on diffusion, and radiofrequency (RF) refocusing effects in gradient‐echo sequences. Methods The model was developed by integrating a forward solution of the Bloch equations with a Brownian dynamics simulator. Simulation configurations were then designed to model MR signal dynamics of interest, with a primary focus on hyperpolarized 13C MRI methods. Phantom scans and spectrophotometric assays were conducted to validate model results in vitro. Results The model accurately reproduced the reaction kinetics of enzyme‐mediated conversion of pyruvate to lactate. When varying proportions of restrictive structure were added to the reaction volume, nonlinear changes in the reaction rate measured in vitro were replicated in silico. Modeling of RF refocusing effects characterized the degree of diffusion‐weighted contribution from preserved residual magnetization in nonspoiled gradient‐echo sequences. Conclusions These results show accurate reproduction of a range of MR signal mechanisms, establishing the model's capability to investigate the multifactorial signal dynamics such as those underlying hyperpolarized 13C MRI data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".