High Resting Heart Rate Is Associated with Cardiovascular Death in Patients with Stroke, Independent of Sex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: High resting heart rate (HRHR) is a surrogate marker of increased sympathetic outflow. In acute stroke patients, HRHR is more commonly observed in women than in men. We analyzed whether HRHR (>86 bpm) adds incremental prognostic value for stroke outcomes in women. METHODS: We analyzed data of 6,024 patients (2,568 women, mean age 68.98 years) with acute ischemic stroke from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA). RESULTS: Patients with HRHR were more often female (45.3 vs. 41.8%, p = 0.017), younger (66.0 ± 13.2 vs. 67.8 ± 12.6 years, p < 0.001), had higher baseline systolic blood pressure and more often diabetes. The primary composite endpoint of recurrent ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular death within 90 days occurred more often in patients with HRHR (19.3 vs. 14.6%, p < 0.001). HRHR was associated with worse functional outcome at 90 days as assessed by modified Rankin Scale (mRS90: 3.03 ± 1.98 vs. 2.82 ± 1.94, p = 0.001). As exclusion of deceased patients (mRS90 of 6) resulted in a loss of association of HRHR with mRS90, it can be assumed that HRHR is mainly associated with poststroke vascular mortality, but not disability. Female sex was not associated with the primary endpoint but with adverse functional outcome measured by mRS90. CONCLUSION: HRHR was associated with adverse events and mortality after stroke. Despite a higher prevalence of HRHR in women, they did not reach the primary endpoint more often. However, women had a worse functional outcome (mRS) 3 months after stroke, independent of HRHR.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".