MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Preface

2024· article· en· W4402358450 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHistory of Computing Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2024 8 th International Conference on Data Mining, Communications and Information Technology (DMCIT 2024), was successfully held on May 25, 2024, which was organized by Asia Pacific Institute of Science and Engineering (APISE), media supported by Internet of Things Technologies, Modern Electronics Technique, Journal of Xidian University, Journal of Information and Intelligence, OPTICAL COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY, Telecommunication Engineering . The conference was held in Hong Kong from May 24-26, 2024 as planned. Considering that some participants could not attend in person, the conference was adjusted as a hybrid conference, as a combination of on-line and off-line conference. The proceedings of this year’s edition comprised three main categories: “1. Advanced Methods and Algorithms”; “2. Applied Technologies in Various Domains”; “3. Case Studies and Practical Implementations”. All these submissions were rigorously reviewed by the Program Committee. The conference attracted 45 submissions in total, and out of 27 papers were accepted, including countries like Canada, France, China, India, New Zealand, Spain, Thailand, etc. On the conference day, 8 oral presentations and 18 poster presentations were arranged according to the participants’ choices. Each presenter was given 15 minutes to deliver their presentation, including 3 minutes Q&A. Two awards, one best oral presentation award and one best poster presentation award were selected by the end of the conference. The conference was inaugurated with the esteemed Dr. Simon Fong from the University of Macau, Macau S.A.R., China, and Dr. Ka-Chun Wong from the City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong S.A.R., China, both delivering outstanding opening remarks. The conference was honored by the presence of four eminent keynote speakers who graced the event with their distinguished speeches. Professor Xianbin Wang from Western University, Canada, Professor Raymond Chi-Wing Wong from The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, Professor Steven Guan from Xi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, China, and Professor Chin-Chen Chang from Feng Chia University, Taiwan ROC, each shared their latest and profoundly insightful research perspectives. The technical session and poster session were formally presided over by Prof. Jiwat Ram, who delivered exemplary and thought-provoking remarks. The DMCIT 2024 conference is dedicated to showcasing the most recent findings and scholarly work in the realms of Data Mining, Communications, Information Technology, and associated fields. Through a combination of oral presentations and poster sessions, the event facilitates a platform for participants to engage in the exchange of innovative concepts, forge professional or academic alliances, and seek out international collaborators for prospective joint ventures. We express our collective gratitude to all participants for their invaluable contributions. The shared knowledge and spirited discussions have been the lifeblood of our gathering, igniting a passion for innovation and collaboration. We are deeply inspired by the intellectual curiosity and the pursuit of knowledge that have been the defining attributes of our conference. The synergy of ideas and the collaborative spirit have laid a robust foundation for the ongoing evolution and progress within our disciplines. Looking forward, we anticipate the enduring impact of this conference, confident that the seeds of thought sown here will flourish into a bountiful harvest of academic achievements. List of Committees are available in this Pdf.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score0.348

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicHistory of Computing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207