MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402358776 · doi:10.1002/uog.29012

EP24.05: Prospective study: transvaginal ultrasound for endometriosis, incorporating IDEA consensus and novel superficial endometriosis inclusion

2024· article· en· W4402358776 on OpenAlexaff
Ido Mick, Shay Freger, M. Marien, Mahsa Gholiof, J. Tigdi, Mathew Leonardi

Bibliographic record

VenueUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometriosis Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndometriosisMedicineInclusion (mineral)Transvaginal ultrasoundUltrasoundGynecologyRadiologyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) is crucial for diagnosing endometriosis, guided by the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) guidelines. While TVS excels in diagnosing ovarian (OE) and deep endometriosis (DE), superficial endometriosis (SE) remains elusive. Previous studies relied on outdated classification guidelines, hindering our understanding of TVS diagnostic accuracy. This study aims to pioneer our understanding of TVS accuracy for DE, OE, and SE, using IDEA consensus and updated guidelines. We performed a prospective diagnostic accuracy study at a tertiary endometriosis referral centre. The index test was TVS, reported in accordance with IDEA consensus and laparoscopy as the reference standard, conducted by the same surgeon sonologist. SE and DE were defined according to the novel classification guidelines as the presence or absence of infiltration. Accuracy (Acc), sensitivity (Sens), specificity (Spec), positive and negative predictive values (PPV/NPV) were calculated for each phenotype and site relative to the reference standard. 125 participants were included. Diagnostic performance of TVS in DE: Acc 92.7 - 99.2%, Sens 82.3 - 100%, Spec 97.0 - 100%, PPV 94.1 - 100%, NPV 88.9 - 100%. For OE of the left and right ovary, respectively, was: Acc 98.3% and 98.4%, Sens 95.0% and 94.9%, Spec 100% and 100%, PPV 100% and 100%, NPV 97.6% and 97.7%. SE assessment in the population excluding DE, OE, and POD obliteration showed: Acc 73.9 - 87.0%, Sens 12.5 - 54.9%, Spec 100%, PPV 100%, NPV 72.2 - 84.6%. TVS demonstrates strong diagnostic performance for DE and OE across anatomical sites. While diagnosing SE is challenging, TVS exhibits strong specificity. These findings support TVS as a primary diagnostic for DE and OE, with enhanced accuracy. However, novel diagnostics are needed to confidently rule out SE, reducing diagnostic delay and improving surgical planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUltrasound in Obstetrics and GynecologySame topicEndometriosis Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207