MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402362180 · doi:10.18264/eadf.v14i1.2212

Construção de um Curso Online Conectivista: a Wikiversidade no Ensino da Saúde Auditiva

2024· article· pt· W4402362180 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
João Alexandre Peschanski, Liráucio Girardi Júnior, Amanda Chevtchouk Jurno, Lílian Cássia Bórnia Jacob-Corteletti

Bibliographic record

VenueEAD em FOCO · 2024
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Public Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este relato de experiência aborda o desenvolvimento inicial de um Curso Online Aberto e Massivo Conectivista (cMOOC) intitulado "Introdução à Audiologia Básica" que explora as integrações potenciais entre as plataformas Wikiversidade e Wikipédia no uso de metodologias ativas na área de saúde auditiva. O cMOOC é um projeto-piloto organizado pela Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru - Universidade de São Paulo em parceria com quatro Universidades de três diferentes regiões do Brasil (sul, sudeste e nordeste) e uma do Canadá (Universidade de Montreal), com apoio do Wiki Movimento Brasil. Trata-se de um relato descritivo e exploratório que visa avaliar a fase inicial de desenvolvimento do cMOOC "Introdução à Audiologia Básica" e examinar as estratégias e resultados da implementação de atividades educativas abertas e colaborativas na área da Audiologia. Serão apresentados o desenvolvimento dos princípios da teoria conectivista, a descrição detalhada do projeto-piloto do cMOOC, destacando as estratégias e resultados da implementação das atividades educativas e exemplos de como a Wikiversidade e a Wikipédia foram integradas como plataformas educacionais. Palavras-chave:Saúde pública. Wikimedia. Colaboração. MOOC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.008
Scholarly communication0.0160.014
Open science0.0020.014
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEAD em FOCOSame topicEducation and Public PolicyFrench-language works237,207