MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Margaret Cavendish

2024· reference-entry· en· W4402368206 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
James B. Fitzmaurice

Bibliographic record

VenueRenaissance and Reformation · 2024
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedical History and Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Margaret Cavendish was the first woman to publish a great deal in English, and she did so under her own name. Her writing includes poetry, fiction, drama, biography, autobiography, essays, fictional letters, and philosophy (especially philosophy of science). Although it is not widely known these days, she was treated with respect by many intellectuals of her time. Her life writing was read and probably imitated by other women such as Lucy Hutchinson. Hutchinson’s biography of her husband, Colonel Hutchinson, shows signs of influence from Cavendish’s earlier and similar biography. Nevertheless, Cavendish was, until the mid-1980s, taken to be of marginal importance as a writer and thinker. Her unusual dress, her work on difficult philosophical topics, and her choosing to have her writing published caused her to be widely regarded as eccentric. Dorothy Osborne (Letters from Dorothy Osborne to Sir William Temple, cited under Reception History (Primary Materials)) suggested in a letter to William Temple that Cavendish belonged in Bedlam, but Osborne found Cavendish amusing rather than dangerous or threatening. Samuel Pepys (The Diary of Samuel Pepys, cited under Reception History (Primary Materials)) did feel threatened and believed that Cavendish’s husband should assert control over her writing. Horace Walpole (A Catalogue of the Royal and Noble Authors of England, Scotland, and Ireland; with Lists of Their Work, cited under Reception History (Primary Materials)) ridiculed Cavendish (while possibly borrowing from her for his play The Mysterious Mother). Charles Lamb Essays of Elia, cited under Reception History (Primary Materials)) found her delightfully odd. Virginia Woolf’s acerbic remarks about Cavendish in The Common Reader (1925) and Room of One’s Own (1929) have been much quoted, but probably hide a sympathy felt by Woolf for a woman whom she believed to be another shy writer. The word “coarse” often appears in 19th-century printed sources in connection with Cavendish, though it is never explained or contextualized. The word is probably connected to low comedy found in her poems about Queen Mab and to Grammont’s 1713 story (The Memoirs of Count Grammont, cited under General Overview) of her as a woman with an eye for young men. Grammont’s view remains generally unnoticed in academe. In the 1980s, Cavendish’s reputation as an eccentric began to fade and her writing increasingly was taken seriously. Her work came to be the subject of scholarly articles, and much of what she wrote, especially Blazing World, was assigned in post-secondary classrooms. The focus in both teaching and research has been on the plays (which have received classroom performance), The Blazing World (as a utopia), and the philosophy (especially panpsychism and the poems about animals). During the 21st century, Cavendish has found her way into the mainstream of public intellectual discourse, as evidenced by Siri Hustvedt’s 2014 novel The Blazing World, cited under Creative Approaches to Cavendish including Modern Interpretations of Her Plays). Merve Emire’s New Yorker article (New Yorker, cited under Intellectual History), and a large number of websites and blogs run outside of academe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenaissance and ReformationSame topicMedical History and InnovationsFrench-language works237,207