MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402374990 · doi:10.3390/s24175823

Radiation Impedance of Rectangular CMUTs

2024· article· en· W4402374990 on OpenAlexafffund
Shayan Khorassany, Eric B. Dew, Mohammad Rahim Sobhani, Roger J. Zemp

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Institutes of HealthAlberta InnovatesAlberta Innovates - Technology FuturesCMC Microsystems
KeywordsRadiation impedanceAcousticsElectrical impedanceFinite element methodTransducerCapacitive sensingRadiationAdmittanceComputer scienceMaterials scienceOpticsEngineeringPhysicsStructural engineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, capacitive micromachined ultrasound transducers (CMUTs) with long rectangular membranes have demonstrated performance advantages over conventional piezoelectric transducers; however, modeling these CMUT geometries has been limited to computationally burdensome numerical methods. Improved fast modeling methods, such as equivalent circuit models, could help achieve designs with even better performance. The primary obstacle in developing such methods is the lack of tractable methods for computing the radiation impedance of clamped rectangular radiators. This paper presents a method that approximates the velocity profile using a polynomial shape model to rapidly and accurately estimate radiation impedance. The validity of the approximate velocity profile and corresponding radiation impedance calculation was assessed using finite element simulations for a variety of membrane aspect ratios and bias voltages. Our method was evaluated for rectangular radiators with width:length ratios from 1:1 up to 1:25. At all aspect ratios, the radiation resistance was closely modeled. However, when calculating the radiation reactance, our initial approach was only accurate for low aspect ratios. This motivated us to consider an alternative shape model for high aspect ratios, which was more accurate when compared with FEM. To facilitate the development of future rectangular CMUTs, we provide a MATLAB script that quickly calculates radiation impedance using both methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207