High‐Resolution Ensemble Modelling of Coral Distributions in the Northern Gulf of Mexico Based on Geomorphometry: Coral Diversity and Benthic Habitat Fragmentation From Oil and Gas Infrastructure to Inform Spatial Planning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The northern Gulf of Mexico is home to several species of corals that provide a wide range of ecosystem services to other organisms. Oil and gas infrastructure, such as platforms and pipelines, form an extensive network throughout the northern Gulf of Mexico. Detrimental impacts associated with oil and gas exploration and extraction have been recorded in this area at depths where corals are found. Due to these ecosystems' vulnerability to long‐term impacts, it is necessary to determine areas of interest that would benefit from further exploration and informed spatial planning. This study aimed to identify potential areas of interest for coral studies in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Ensemble species distribution models for 13 species of corals including scleractinians, black corals, and octocorals were produced based on seafloor characteristics and combined to identify areas with relatively higher coral diversity potential than others. The ensemble modelling approach produced robust outputs, as evaluated by the area under the curve, Cohen's kappa coefficient, sensitivity, specificity and the proportion of correct predictions. The proximity of suitable habitat to active and proposed oil and gas infrastructure was evaluated; this spatial analysis showed that oil and gas infrastructures potentially impact 23.5% of all predicted suitable coral habitat in the study area and contribute to benthic habitat fragmentation. Twelve areas of interest greater than 100 km2 and located outside a 4‐km zone of potential influence from oil and gas infrastructure were delineated and deemed of interest for further exploration and spatial planning, and hypothetical prioritization scenarios for spatial planning are presented. The maps produced can inform discussions among stakeholders to reach the best spatial planning outcomes while considering other ecological, social, economic and governance factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".