MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402381369 · doi:10.7759/cureus.68963

Autologous Conditioned Serum in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Current Clinical Evidence

2024· review· en· W4402381369 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Naveen Jeyaraman, Madhan Jeyaraman, Swaminathan Ramasubramanian, Sankalp Yadav, Sangeetha Balaji, Bishnu Prasad Patro, Ashim Gupta

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOsteoarthritisCurrent (fluid)Physical therapyIntensive care medicinePathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) significantly impacts global health, causing pain, disability, and socioeconomic burden. Traditional treatments often provide only temporary relief and can have adverse effects. Autologous conditioned serum (ACS) therapy, which enriches a patient's own blood with growth factors and anti-inflammatory cytokines, has emerged as a promising approach to manage knee OA, potentially offering pain reduction, improved function, and tissue regeneration. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane using terms like "Autologous Conditioned Serum" and "knee osteoarthritis." Clinical studies were selected based on their focus on ACS's efficacy in knee OA, assessing outcomes like pain relief, functional improvement, and adverse events. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and comparative analyses. The review included a wide range of study designs and outcomes, highlighting ACS's efficacy in reducing pain and enhancing knee function as evidenced by various patient-reported outcome measures Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Society Clinical Rating Score (KSCRS) with a follow-up of up to 11 years (range: 2-11 years). Comparative studies showed ACS to be as effective or superior to conventional treatments such as platelet-rich plasma, steroids, and hyaluronic acid, especially in cases of moderate synovitis. Minimal adverse effects such as peri-injection pain, rigidity, synovitis, transient sensation of redness/heat, and numbness in the knee/leg/toes were reported, underscoring ACS's safety. Some studies suggested ACS might also have disease-modifying effects, contributing to tissue repair and integrity. ACS therapy offers a promising alternative for knee OA management, demonstrating potential benefits in symptom alleviation, functional improvement, and safety. Indications of disease-modifying properties further highlight its therapeutic value. However, the need for standardized formulations and treatment protocols, long-term studies, and mechanistic understanding remain. Future research should focus on addressing these gaps to fully elucidate ACS's role in the treatment landscape of knee OA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.022
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.022
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.009
Bibliometrics0.0090.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureus→Same topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→