Miniature Furnace Temperature Monitoring System Using Wireless-Based Resistance Temperature Detector Sensor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PT. GCNS in Morowali, which produces NPI (Nickel Pig Iron), has a furnace area of the Ferronickel Department for melting raw ore materials into NPI.In this area, there are many sensors, one of which is the RTD sensor, which is used to measure temperature in various processes in the furnace system.Through the observation, problems were found related to replacing damaged sensors because these sensors still use cables in pipes with complicated and long paths.So that during the sensor maintenance process, it is necessary to check and dismantle the complicated cable paths in the pipes, resulting in the production process stopping in the furnace for a long time.This study implemented a sensor system that uses NodeMCU ESP8266 as a wireless device that functions as a data sender and receiver module from the RTD sensor, which is integrated with the PWM to voltage and voltage to current converter module so that the sensor reading data can be integrated with the 4-20 mA analog input on the PLC.So, wireless sensors can eliminate complicated wiring systems and save more time during maintenance.The test results on Sensors 1, 2, and 3 have an average difference value of 0.36, 0.53, and 0.59, respectively.The percentage of errors produced respectively are 0.68%, 1.162%, and 1.21%; the occurrence of error values in the testing process is due to the accuracy of the NodeMCU used of 10 bits, or 4 mV for every 1 decimal change.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it