Joint Optimization of Caching, Computing, and Trajectory Planning in Aerial Mobile Edge Computing Networks: An MADDPG Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 6G network is expected to accommodate a wide array of connected devices, supporting diverse services from any location at any time. In this article, we introduce an aerial mobile edge computing (MEC) framework composed of high-altitude platforms (HAPs) and low-altitude unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), to cater to computing offloading for Internet of Things (IoT) devices, particularly in rural/remote areas or disaster zones. The framework accommodates various types of tasks, each computed by the corresponding Docker container. The objective is to achieve optimal workload fairness for UAVs while simultaneously minimizing the weighted processing costs among IoT devices in terms of task computation latency and energy consumption over the long term. This is achieved by jointly optimizing the flight trajectories and Docker image caching decisions of the UAVs with limited storage capacities, alongside ensuring service fairness for IoT devices. We tailor a multiagent deep deterministic policy gradient (MADDPG)-based approach to solve the long-term joint optimization problem, normalizing continuous actions and sampling discrete actions by generalizing the Gumbel-Softmax reparameterization trick. Experimental results indicate that our approach significantly outperforms benchmark schemes in terms of processing delay, energy consumption, and fairness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".