MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402390682 · doi:10.23889/ijpds.v9i5.2669

Using newly linked hospital and population data to identify opportunities to reduce harms from sedative-hypnotic prescribing at population scale

2024· article· en· W4402390682 on OpenAlexaffabout
Surain B. Roberts, Mohammad Arshad Imrit, Marwa Ismail, Trong Shen, Christine Soong, Barbara Liu, Denise Mak, Vladyslav Kushnir, Laura C. Rosella, Fahad Razak, Amol A. Verma

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal for Population Data Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMental Health Treatment and Access
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalTrillium Health CentreSunnybrook Health Science CentreSinai Health SystemInstitute of Health Services and Policy Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSedative/hypnoticSedativeScale (ratio)PopulationMedicinePsychiatryPsychologyEnvironmental healthGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective and ApproachSedative-hypnotic medications are associated with harms such as delirium and falls, and may be overprescribed in hospitals. Measuring potentially inappropriate in-hospital sedative-hypnotic prescriptions requires distinguishing new initiations from pre-hospital prescriptions, but pre-hospital medications may not be captured in hospital data. To quantify physician- and hospital-level variation in sedative-hypnotic prescribing, we use linked data between GEMINI (which includes EMR data from >1.8 million admissions across 30 hospitals, approximately 60% of medical inpatient beds in Ontario) and ICES (which houses administrative healthcare databases, including outpatient prescriptions for adults ≥65 years). We will validate whether data in hospital clinical notes or pharmacy records can reliably identify pre-hospital prescriptions. ResultsUsing provincial health insurance number, 98.1% of GEMINI records could successfully be linked deterministically to ICES. Our exploratory sedative-hypnotic cohort included 90,806 general medicine patients treated by 437 physicians from 17 hospitals across Ontario from 2021-2022. Median age was 72 years and 48.7% were female. The proportion of patients receiving a new sedative-hypnotic prescription varied markedly across hospitals (median 0.21, range 0.04-0.41) and across physicians within hospitals (median within-hospital difference between lowest and highest prescriber: 0.18, range of within-hospital differences 0.07-0.67). Validation of new rather than continued prescriptions is underway. Full results will be ready for presentation at the conference. ConclusionSedative-hypnotic prescribing is common and highly variable in hospitals across Ontario, indicating an opportunity to improve patient safety. Implications Based on these analyses, the province of Ontario has made reducing in-hospital sedative-hypnotic prescribing a provincial priority for 2023-2024.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score0.624

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.415
GPT teacher head0.532
Teacher spread0.117 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal for Population Data Science→Same topicMental Health Treatment and Access→French-language works237,207→