Neuropsychiatric symptoms: Risk factor or disease marker? A study of structural imaging biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease and incident cognitive decline
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are risk factors for Alzheimer's disease (AD) but can also manifest secondary to AD pathology. Mild behavioral impairment (MBI) refers to later-life emergent and persistent NPS that may mark early-stage AD. To distinguish MBI from NPS that are transient or which represent psychiatric conditions (non-MBI NPS), we investigated the effect of applying MBI criteria on NPS associations with AD structural imaging biomarkers and incident cognitive decline. Data for participants (n = 1273) with normal cognition (NC) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set were analyzed. NPS status (MBI, non-MBI NPS) was derived from the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire and psychiatric history. Normalized measures of bilateral hippocampal (HPC) and entorhinal cortex (EC) volume, and AD meta-region of interest (ROI) mean cortical thickness were acquired from T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans. Multivariable linear and Cox regressions examined NPS associations with imaging biomarkers and incident cognitive decline, respectively. MBI was associated with lower volume and cortical thickness in all ROIs in both NC and MCI, except for EC volume in NC. Non-MBI NPS were only associated with lower HPC volume in NC. Although both of the NPS groups showed higher hazards for MCI/dementia than No NPS, MBI participants showed more rapid decline. Although both types of NPS were linked to HPC atrophy, only NPS that emerged and persisted in later-life, consistent with MBI criteria, were related to AD neurodegenerative patterns beyond the HPC. Moreover, MBI predicted faster progression to dementia than non-MBI NPS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".