Comparison of sEMG activity of submental muscles between the head‐lift exercise, tongue‐press exercise and the head extension tongue‐press exercise in healthy young adults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Swallowing is a complex function that requires precise coordination between different muscles. Weakness in submental muscles can lead to complications such as pharyngeal residue and aspiration. Therefore, exercise interventions targeting these muscles, such as the Head-Lift Exercise (HLE), are clinically important but pose challenges. OBJECTIVE(S): This study aimed to compare the myoelectric activity of submental muscles during traditional Head-Lift Exercise (HLE), Tongue-Press Exercise (TPE) and Head Extension Tongue-Press Exercise (HETPE), providing potential alternatives to HLE. METHODS: Thirty healthy volunteers (22 females and 8 males, mean age 25.63 ± 5.27 years) participated in this cross-sectional study. Surface electromyography (sEMG) recorded activity of the submental muscles bilaterally during HLE, TPE and HETPE. Participants performed each manoeuvre for 14 s, repeated three times in a counterbalanced order. Statistical analyses assessed differences in mean, maximum and median frequency of the sEMG signals among manoeuvres using repeated-measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA). The experienced irritation levels by participants during manoeuvres were also compared by the Friedman test. RESULTS: HETPE exhibited significantly higher maximum sEMG activity compared to HLE and TPE (p < .05). Mean sEMG activity was significantly increased during HETPE compared to TPE. Median frequency was significantly lower during HETPE compared to the two other exercises, indicating greater muscle fatigue. Participants reported similar levels of irritation for HLE and HETPE, and significantly lower levels during TPE. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that HETPE is effective in activating and strengthening submental muscles, potentially serving as a viable alternative to HLE without added difficulty. Further research is recommended to assess the long-term impacts on swallowing physiology in patients with dysphagia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".