A High-Efficiency Propulsion Motor With Distributed High-Density Winding Technology
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents the development of an electric motor with the novel distributed high-density (DHD) winding technology. The DHD winding technology utilizes round wires instead of bar wires. Unlike conventional round-wire winding technique (shed winding), the wires are orderly positioned in the slots in the DHD winding technology, resulting in high fill factor and high efficiency. The implementation of a stator with the DHD winding is presented which utilizes state-of-the-art coil winding and assembly processes. To compare against existing stator designs, a 100 kW, 800 V, and 15 000 RPM propulsion motor is tested experimentally to validate the performance of the DHD winding technology. The acoustic noise behavior of the propulsion motor is also characterized experimentally. The motor efficiency with the DHD, hairpin, and shed windings is compared for the same stator geometry using simulation results to demonstrate the performance improvement with the DHD winding technology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it