MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402401573 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3457372

FEDge-HAR: An Optimized Private Mobile Edge-Enabled IoT Paradigm for Privacy of Human Activity Recognition

2024· article· en· W4402401573 on OpenAlexaff
Ateeq Ur Rehman, Mahnoor Farooq, Gautam Srivastava, Rakan Aldmour, Ryan Alturki, Bandar Alshawi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
FundersNingbo Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology
KeywordsComputer scienceInternet of ThingsEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionEdge computingComputer securityInformation privacyInternet privacyActivity recognitionMobile telephonyComputer networkHuman–computer interactionTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceMobile radio

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a pivotal technology for the Internet of Things (IoT) that models distributed client data without compromising privacy. The IoT-based wearable generates data and FL running on a private edge performing human activity recognition (HAR). In this article, we proposed a novel technique to protect sensitive data during the training process and ensure the confidentiality of model updates before transmission to the edge server. The proposed technique integrates the El-Gamal encryption technique for data protection, and the FL process is rigorously optimized using pruning, quantization, and network slicing. Pruning removes redundant connections, which reduces model complexity and communication delays. On the other hand, quantization decreases the bit precision of model parameters, and network slicing strategically allocates resources solely for FL resulting in low latency and optimal bandwidth utilization. The results are evaluated in terms of accuracy and communication overhead, which is highly required in real-world applications. Furthermore, the HAR system within PEC shows better results by achieving an accuracy of 99% at 300 epochs that outperformed existing machine learning (ML) algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207