MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402401922 · doi:10.22215/cjers.v17i1.4385

Falsehood in Wartime: Hiding Truths and Spreading Untruths in Russia During the First Year of Putin’s War in Ukraine’

2024· article· en· W4402401922 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
L. Black

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of European and Russian Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceEconomic historySpanish Civil WarLawHistoryPolitical economySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The old adage that truth is the first casualty of war held fast during the build-up to, and the conduct of, the ‘special military operation’ (SVO) launched by Vladimir Putin against Ukraine on 24 February 2022 is no exception to the rule. The Russian state’s methods for sustaining its changing official narrative about the SVO are detailed here, as are the ways and means the dissident portion of Russia’s citizenry made their objections to the war in Ukraine heard during its first year. The Kremlin’s already firm grip in the distribution of information was tightened. Russia’s wordsmiths were silenced, jailed or fled the country. School curricula were re-organized so that they became incubators of young Russian patriots. The paper concludes with conjecture on why the state’s message found such a welcoming audience among Russians, at least during the first year of war. Les réponses du Kremlin aux voix pacifistes en Russie : annoncer la couleur pendant la première année de la guerre L’« opération militaire spéciale » (SVO), déclenchée par Vladimir Poutine contre l’Ukraine le 24 février 2022, a surpris la majorité des Russes. Il a fallu les persuader de sa justesse, par tous les moyens possibles. Cet article détaille les méthodes employées par l’État russe pour appuyer son discours officiel changeant au sujet de la SVO ainsi que les moyens trouvés par les groupes dissidents de la société civile pour faire entendre leur voix durant la première année de la guerre. Le Kremlin a affermi sa poigne déjà puissante sur la distribution des informations tandis que les opposants vocaux ont été réduits au silence, emprisonnés ou forcés de fuir le pays. Les programmes des écoles ont été modifiés afin qu’elles servent d’incubateurs de jeunes patriotes russes. L’article se conclut par une conjecture sur les raisons qui ont poussé le public russe à accepter le message étatique si chaleureusement, du moins pendant la première année de la guerre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.020
Scholarly communication0.0120.007
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of European and Russian StudiesSame topicEuropean and Russian Geopolitical Military StrategiesFrench-language works237,207