A CORRELAÇÃO ENTRE O USO DE ESCITALOPRAM EM IDOSOS E O PROLONGAMENTO DO INTERVALO QT.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To achieve the objective of verifying whether there is a correlation between the use of escitalopram in the elderly and QT prolongation, a search was carried out in Pubmed, Scielo and Lilacs. The selected studies were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assesses study quality. The studies indicate that the link between escitalopram use and serious arrhythmia is weak despite FDA recommendations. The risk of arrhythmia and mortality associated with escitalopram also decreased over time. Cardiac comorbidities increase the risk of QT prolongation and mortality, and modifiable risk factors like hypokalemia and drug interactions should be addressed in at-risk individuals. Healthcare providers face a difficult decision regarding dosage restrictions and medication switching, taking into account escitalopram's effectiveness and tolerability. More research and awareness are needed to optimize antidepressant therapy for cardiac safety.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it